The Dark Side of Research - A Guest Post by Pamela Kelt
By Pamela Kelt, author of Dark Interlude, out through MuseItUp in June 2013
Many people assume, when you actually get
round to writing your first book, that you studied English.
I did to an extent, but quit when I saw 16,
concentrating on languages. Spanish was my favourite subject, closely followed
by Latin. It was an easy choice to pursue to university, and I became so
fascinated by 17th-century satire and comedy, that I managed to get a grant for
post-graduate research.
The M.Litt. thesis title was ‘Aspects of
comedy in the interludes of Luis Quiñones de Benavente’.
It sounds all very high-brow, but it was a
blast. Carnivalesque humour, subversive characters, wit – and most of it in
rhyme.
I often wondered if I could ever recycle
the research – and then one day, it came to me. An archivist cataloguing 17th-century
Spanish comedies would unearth a dark secret … Duh-duh-duh.
Research for historical stories can often
take so long, but I was already halfway there! It would be fun to browse
through old notes, books, the thesis and other manuscripts from my student
days. I was reminded me how different research was in the 1980s – all
hand-written catalogue cards and an ability to decipher any style of handwriting
whatsoever.
I fancied setting a story in Scotland,
being a great fan. And then I pondered what dark secret might link it all
together. A previous book was set in 1885, but I decided to move things along a
bit. So, I browsed some Scottish history websites and came upon some startling
facts. Apparently, there was a revolution, or more accurately, a series of
mini-revolutions and major strikes that began even before the so-called Great
War had ended.
I’m fairly comfortable with English
Victorian and Edwardian historical landmarks – or I thought I was. This series
of ‘mutinies’ are they were described, came as a shock.
We’ve all read and heard so much about the
dreadful conditions of WW1, the gallantry and the horror. But not every soldier
approved of the chain of command. One story led to another and I ended up
spending quite some time on this unfamiliar phenomenon. I often find that I’m
rummaging, not sure of what I want until I find it. Then it’s the classic
Eureka moment.
I began to dig. At first, it was a few demonstrations
but in Etaples in 1917, for instance, things got serious. The camp was infamous
for its punitive stance on injured soldiers, many of whom apparently claimed to
be relieved to return to the front. The men gathered in protest after a soldier
was arrested. Men gathered in their hundreds, refusing to disperse. Military
police arrived. There were scuffles. Shots. Two people were killed. Finally,
the authorities brought the camp under control, but the story was suppressed.
I found several articles listing other mutinies
all over Europe and North America – and then found the Scottish connection.
They called it Black Friday, or The Revolution that Never Was. After the war,
it wasn’t just the soldiers who were angry, tired and weary of authority.
Dissent spread across the workforce. Police, railwaymen, dockworkers, machine
workers – most of them went on strike at some time or another.
The authorities feared the Bolsheviks were
to blame – after all, the revolutionary fervour must have spread from Russia.
But it was everywhere. They even had a general strike in Swizterland in
November 1918! No, the problem was much worse. The people had simply had
enough.
Of course, one has to read between the
lines. Some of the websites were clearly Marxist – and several disappeared while
I working on them, which was rather unsettling. Still, as I concentrated on the
Scottish situation, I came across established academics writing on the theme,
so I was assured it really did happen.
At the time, the authorities, including
luminaries such as Winston Churchill, were keen to suppress the workers – and
keep as much out of the papers as possible. No wonder it’s hard to find
evidence. Some of the best sources were books based on oral history, interviews
with people whose relatives remembered the event. These books, such as Maggie
Craig’s When the Clyde Ran Red, were fascinating and inspirational.
This must have been true of so many
‘mutinies’ and protests of the time. Much more work will have to be done before
the people’s point of view is lost.
DARK INTERLUDE is fiction based against the
backdrop of an actual event. Some real-life figures from the dispute make an
appearance, but merely as cameos to authenticate the story.
Some critics pooh-pooh historical fiction,
but I feel it’s important. Yes, take liberties, but if it brings the past to
life and encourages us to avoid such conflicts again, while hailing the real
heroes and appreciating hardships of ordinary people, then it must be
worthwhile and a valuable contribution in its own right.
Some stories don’t need to be invented.
They’ve happened already.
Info:
For more information on Pamela and her
books, visit her website - http://pamelakelt.weebly.com/.
To find out more about Dark Interlude, visit the blog. http://darkinterlude.blogspot.co.uk/
Brief bio:
Pamela Kelt has a background in journalism
and publishing. She is now the author of six books. She lives in leafy
Warwickshire with her husband Rob (co-author of the next Muse title, Half
Life), where she enjoys watching her windowsill orchids grow, walking her two
daft dogs and keeping up with the best YA adventures and murder mysteries
around.
Comments
Winston Churchill isn't greatly popular with Australians. He was responsible for the Gallipoli campaign in W.W.1 and the Greece-Crete campaign in W.W.2, which involved our troops and were both failures.
And he had no interest in WW2 in the Pacific. He drew an imaginary line at the level of Brisbane, capital of Queensland, and was prepared to let the area north of it (more than 1000 miles) fall to the Japanese. He also resisted the return of our fighting men from north Africa to Australia to defend the country when the Japanese invaded New Guinea. A great man, sure, but with no thought for any one outside Europe and the main arena of conflict.
Research is fascinating. I didn't have the internet when I wanted to establish the background for my own historical novel. So it was a matter of writing to the places concerned, and looking up a lot of encyclopaedias and other books. As it was I made two or three small mistakes, but most people didn't notice them!
Thanks so much for your comments. I'm constantly astonished about how much was hidden from the ordinary folk, as you say, but I take heart from online archives, which are helping the truth to come out. This sort of research is fascinating - but sometimes it's hard to stop and make the book happen! I do find, though, that I tend to read more when I download documents onto my e-reader. They can be a bit daunting otherwise.
He was a brilliant man, but not popular. Our nearest city is Coventry, and many there still blame him for allowing the city to be bombed (to preserve the Enigma secret). He was actually booed in Bath when he went to visit after the Bath Blitz. My husband's from Tasmania, so I have an inkling of the Antipodean point of view, too.
The internet is such a useful tool, and I'm probably a bit of an addict. However, I still recall researching the old-fashioned way - and having to decipher some pretty spidery handwriting on dusty old index cards.
I like to think that if you empathise with the story and the era, you might be allowed a few liberties and the occasional wobbly detail. Nobody's perfect!